Before the year was up I decided to read a book that I've been hearing about for several years, namely "Dianetics". In my last two posts I mentioned some of the controversial statements made in the book (released 60 years ago), and compared them with modern popular science. In particular, I found that:
1. science does show that human beings can find themselves compelled to behave in ways that they would actually prefer not to (despite financial, physical, and other detrimental consequences) even after making serious attempts to stop.
2. science does show that human beings can start to store and recall perceptions prenatally (before birth), and furthermore that human beings can store what they have perceived accurately, for the rest of their adult lives (although most are not expected to recall this data in day-to-day life).
In this post I will mention a third very interesting, controversial claim and take a look at how valid science has determined it to be, 60 years later.
3. That the "reactive mind" (as a flawed self-defense mechanism) can intercept the functions of one's rational "analytical mind", causing people to make up and believe amazingly sensible - yet completely false - explanations for irrational behavior. This is another major concept of Dianetics, which is paired with the idea that the "reactive mind" can compel the body to manifest very real physical problems, without external causes present (these are known as psychosomatic conditions).
- Have you ever tried to explain something you didn't understand, and come up with a very reasonable - but ultimately wrong explanation? I once thought someone stole money from me and told them (angrily) that they must have took it when I went to the bathroom. You can imagine my surprise when I found the money in one of my own pockets - LOL! Anyway, I've experienced how well the human mind can convince one of something that isn't necessarily true. Let's see what science has to say:
Professor Robert Sapolsky, who's work is the subject of a National Geographic documentary, has shown that stress is useful to animals in the wild. In the wild, stress helps shut down various parts of the body, and focus only on those that can help the animal get the heck away from whatever predator is trying to bite their head off (in layman's terms). After a few minutes the animal is dead or has escaped, and the stress response ceases. Sapolsky shows that humans use the same stress response based on elements of their every day environment, and unfortunately we (including the professor) don't seem to turn them off after a few minutes, which results in chronic health issues.
According to Dr. Ian Wickramasekera, writing in the Handbook of Mind-Body Medicine for Primary Care, "Somatization is the name medicine gives to the process by which an individual, 'hiding' from threatening psychological information, expresses... his or her emotional distress into physical symptoms of maladaptive behavior." He goes on to list several of the physical symptoms that result. In terms of how common this is, the Dr. states, "Somatization may sound exotic, a phenomenon to be found in only a small number of patients. Nothing could be further from the truth. Estimates have determined that somatizing patients probably represent as many as half of the people seen by primary care doctors."
Ian says something else pertinent to Dianetics in an online article, "Many people who have stress-related pain aren't even aware of what they're fearful or angry about." He also says that right after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, "In 30 years of specializing in stress-related diseases, I've never seen more flare-ups of physical pain, even in people who'd been free of symptoms for years."
In 2007, researchers published a study regarding, "...a key mechanism by which the stress hormone noradrenaline - which floods the bloodstream during grizzly encounters and other stressful events - affects the brain's pain-processing pathway to produce such analgesia."
Scientists have known for years that nerve endings send messages to the brain upon being damaged (for instance by a hot or sharp object), and in return the brain sends pain to that area, as if to compel us to move away from the dangerous object. Notably though, it is not the object that puts pain into the human body, but the human body that generates pain to protect itself from that object. Now modern science has verified that the human body can manifest pain and other chemical, biological phenomena in order to protect itself from a source of pain - minutes, hours, and yes, years after the original source of pain is gone.
As for the mind's ability to come up with reasonable - yet wrong - explanations for irrational behavior, this is known in the field of psychology as "rationalisation". It is known to psychologists as the defense mechanism of providing socially acceptable reasons for inappropriate behavior. Although you can find plenty of examples in every day life, most of the scientific research on rationalisation comes from tests done on hypnotic subjects. In fact, hypnotism has often been feared, specifically because of it's ability to have a subject rationalize (after committing) otherwise unacceptable behavior. Over 100 years ago, George Du Maurier wrote a novel (fiction) alerting the public to this danger, entitled "Trilby".
Today there are hypnotists working as entertainers, as well as in the field of self-help. When I was in college, our student activities council hired a hypnotist to entertain the students. I remember him having a student remove their jacket and replace it repeatedly, when the hypnotist touched his tie, and then come up with all kinds of sensible reasons for why he was doing it.
As for the science, Carla Emery collected a huge amount of the research for her book, "Secret, Don't Tell: the Encyclopedia of Hypnotism". In this book, she quotes a Yale hypnosis researcher by the name of Clark Hull, describing one experiment:
"I give him a posthypnotic suggestion that after waking he shall pick up and examine a book on my desk when I sit down in a chair, but that he won’t recall anything about why he did it. I wake him as usual with a snap of my finger...A few minutes later I sit down in the chair. He casually walks over to my desk, picks up the book, and after glancing at its title lays it down. I say, ‘Why did you look at the book?’ He answers that he just happened to notice it lying there and wondered what it was about."
So after 60 years, modern science indicates that Dianetics was not merely a theory or a work of science fiction. As I mentioned, there is a lot more to the book, but I wanted to research a few of the highlights that most interested me, and share what I found with anyone interested:
In summary, human beings do exhibit the ability to do the following:
1. Shut down normal mental and physical functions of the body in response to pain. 2. Switch mental and physical functions in to a defense mode (sounds like what our government would do if declaring a state of emergency - LOL).
3. Continue recording words, sounds, and other information (even if unconscious or still in the womb).
4. Become unaware of these incidents, even while keeping them stored.
5. Access previous recordings that contain similar information or similar moments of pain (no matter how long ago they were recorded - even if it was prenatally).
6. Act out words or emotions contained in these previous recordings (just as a hypnotist would have a subject act on previous commands through posthypnotic suggestion).
7. Find ways to make sense of words contained in these painful moments even if they don't initially make sense, in order to act out the information within them.
8. Find ways to explain the irrational behavior, even if they don't realize they were responding to recordings made during earlier moments of pain.
Along with more details about the mind, Dianetics includes a process for locating these moments of pain with the aware, rational part of the mind, so that they are no longer hidden - and no longer compel any irrational behavior during actual or threatened moments of pain in the future.
The best part of the book to me, was the example of the "held down 7". A calculator can be in perfect condition, capable of quickly solving complex problems. Yet, if somehow the "7" button gets stuck, the calculator will continue throwing an additional 7 into the computations, resulting in the incorrect answers. More specifically, by including additional "7"s in the problems, the calculator arrives at CORRECT ANSWERS to DIFFERENT PROBLEMS than it's operator is asking it to solve. Apparently, the human mind may work in a similar way. Unfortunately, finding the buttons that are pressed in one's mind is not as easy as finding a stuck "7" key on a calculator, especially since the mind does such a good job of rationalising strange behavior.
My final thought on this book, is that it reminds me of a quote from President Franklin D. Roosevelt, "There's nothing to fear, but fear itself."
Friday, December 25, 2009
What's the Deal with Dianetics? part 2
Continuing from my last post, let's get into another controversial highlight from Dianetics, and see how it stacks up against popular science 60 years later.
2. That the reactive mind can command people to behave irrationally based on recordings (which may include more than sights and sounds) that were stored in a person's mind several years ago is another major concept of Dianetics. Even more controversial was the idea that these reactive mind commands were often found to come from recordings taken around - and before - the time of birth.
- You might observe that even a modern reality TV show doesn't have time to play everything that is recorded in the lives of it's participants. Since it takes more time to describe what happens in your life, than it takes to live through it, we can't test whether someone's mind can retrieve every piece of information it ever perceived. However, let's take a look at what modern science has to say about how long we can store information:
Thomas R. Verny writes in "The Secret Life of the Unborn Child", "The fetus can see, hear, experience, taste and, on a primitive level, even learn in utero..."
Research, experiments, and even courses proving the existence of prenatal memory have become available through professionals such as Rene Van de Carr, Dr. Anthony DeCasper and Professor Makoto Shichida.
Kim Peek (Rest in Peace), who was the inspiration for the movie "Rain Man" (starring Dustin Hoffman and Tom Cruise), was able to give the correct answers to questions asked at random, regarding anything he'd read about, as well as the dates of his own life experiences.
Brad Williams , Bob Petrella, and Jill Price (who was featured on NPR) are others who have recently been proven to have total recall of experiences dating back to the beginning of their lives.
Those interested kind find out more about the scientific research regarding the above cases. This second point seems to be valid under science after 60 years:
Modern science, through the research of doctors and professors, has proven that a human being can accurately store and recall facts (as well as events and the dates on which they occurred) for the rest of their lives. Furthermore, science has also shown that a human being can begin learning and responding to what is learned prenatally (before birth). As I previously mentioned, this post only touches on a small bit of what is contained in Dianetics, but it is significant to note that Dianetics doesn't refer to memories per se. Rather, it refers to the recordings of painful moments that make up the "reactive mind" (and force people to do irrational things in the presence of a perceived threat) as "engrams". An "engram" is not recorded or remembered in the way that a normal memory is.
According to Dianetics, the part of the mind that functions rationally, the "analytical mind", cannot access "engrams" as it can standard memory. When the "reactive mind" takes over, contacting an engram, it simultaneously shuts down the "analytical mind". Dianetics describes a method for accessing these "engrams" (which can be stored and hidden from one's awareness for as long as they are alive) and making them available to the "analytical mind" as standard mental image pictures, so they can no longer compel irrational behavior.
I'll save my third interesting highlight of Dianetics for the next post, where we'll see what else modern science has to say regarding these controversial statements made 60 years ago...
2. That the reactive mind can command people to behave irrationally based on recordings (which may include more than sights and sounds) that were stored in a person's mind several years ago is another major concept of Dianetics. Even more controversial was the idea that these reactive mind commands were often found to come from recordings taken around - and before - the time of birth.
- You might observe that even a modern reality TV show doesn't have time to play everything that is recorded in the lives of it's participants. Since it takes more time to describe what happens in your life, than it takes to live through it, we can't test whether someone's mind can retrieve every piece of information it ever perceived. However, let's take a look at what modern science has to say about how long we can store information:
Thomas R. Verny writes in "The Secret Life of the Unborn Child", "The fetus can see, hear, experience, taste and, on a primitive level, even learn in utero..."
Research, experiments, and even courses proving the existence of prenatal memory have become available through professionals such as Rene Van de Carr, Dr. Anthony DeCasper and Professor Makoto Shichida.
Kim Peek (Rest in Peace), who was the inspiration for the movie "Rain Man" (starring Dustin Hoffman and Tom Cruise), was able to give the correct answers to questions asked at random, regarding anything he'd read about, as well as the dates of his own life experiences.
Brad Williams , Bob Petrella, and Jill Price (who was featured on NPR) are others who have recently been proven to have total recall of experiences dating back to the beginning of their lives.
Those interested kind find out more about the scientific research regarding the above cases. This second point seems to be valid under science after 60 years:
Modern science, through the research of doctors and professors, has proven that a human being can accurately store and recall facts (as well as events and the dates on which they occurred) for the rest of their lives. Furthermore, science has also shown that a human being can begin learning and responding to what is learned prenatally (before birth). As I previously mentioned, this post only touches on a small bit of what is contained in Dianetics, but it is significant to note that Dianetics doesn't refer to memories per se. Rather, it refers to the recordings of painful moments that make up the "reactive mind" (and force people to do irrational things in the presence of a perceived threat) as "engrams". An "engram" is not recorded or remembered in the way that a normal memory is.
According to Dianetics, the part of the mind that functions rationally, the "analytical mind", cannot access "engrams" as it can standard memory. When the "reactive mind" takes over, contacting an engram, it simultaneously shuts down the "analytical mind". Dianetics describes a method for accessing these "engrams" (which can be stored and hidden from one's awareness for as long as they are alive) and making them available to the "analytical mind" as standard mental image pictures, so they can no longer compel irrational behavior.
I'll save my third interesting highlight of Dianetics for the next post, where we'll see what else modern science has to say regarding these controversial statements made 60 years ago...
Thursday, December 24, 2009
What's the deal with Dianetics? part 1
In 1950, Dianetics was released becoming one of the most controversial and best selling books on the mind ever. Well I've finally got around to reading it for myself, and as a favor to anyone interested, I'm going to quickly share some of the highlights. In addition, we'll take a look at how some of the controversial information released 60 years ago in this book stands up to modern science.
Firstly, it should be noted that the author states in the last chapter, that Dianetics is not complete, and that he expects others to continue to study and improve upon his own findings. He also gives credit to dozens of authors and thousands of years of research by others, rather than claiming to be the first one to study the mind. However, he points out that some of the greatest discoveries of the past, which he used to develop Dianetics, came from people who also believed things that were found to be totally wrong. Therefore, the aim of the book is not so much on claiming to be the alpha and omega of information on the mind (as I'd previously been told). Instead the aim of the book is to determine and develop the most valuable information on the mind in regards to improving our society.
So what are some of the controversial statements found in Dianetics, and how do they stand up against modern popular science?
The main concern of the book is that individuals are not always acting in a reasonable fashion. More specifically, a part of the human mind that evolved to help us survive has outgrown it's usefulness. This part, the "reactive mind", takes over the rational part (termed the analytical mind), when it receives cues that the person's survival is being threatened. The problem is that the "reactive mind" is irrational, compelling the individual to do very strange things as a defense mechanism against whatever the perceived threat is.
The "reactive mind" grows from moments of pain and loss, which it irrationally associates with whatever was in the person's environment during those moments. As experiences differ, some people will have more of a reactive mind than others. As environments differ, some people will be compelled to have their "reactive mind" take over more than others. There is a lot more to the book, but this is my brief insight into the basic concept of Dianetics. Of course more interestingly, a method of overcoming the "reactive mind" is detailed in the book.
So how valid are the controversial claims of Dianetics? Let's take a look at a few.
1. That people sometimes do irrational things, that they did not plan to do, and that they actually regret doing, is one of the main concepts. Most notable in this concept, is the idea that some people will find themselves chronically (on an ongoing basis) behaving in a way that they really do not want to. Those people would very much like to change their behavior, but despite their desire, cannot do so.
- You may have heard people utter the expressions, "Why did I do that?", "Why do I keep doing that?", or "Sorry, I wasn't in my right mind.", but let's take a look at what modern science has to say:
The National Institute on Drug Abuse notes:
The initial decision to take drugs is mostly voluntary. However, when drug abuse takes over, a person's ability to exert self control can become seriously impaired. Brain imaging studies from drug-addicted individuals show physical changes in areas of the brain that are critical to judgment, decisionmaking, learning and memory, and behavior control.
and also notes:
As with any other disease, vulnerability to addiction differs from person to person.
the Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, in the paper "What Works in Reducing
Adolescent Violence: An Empirical Review of the Field" notes 4 patterns of adolescent violence:
Situational: wherein violence is brought about due to certain environmental conditions
Relationship: wherein violence is occurs mainly between close family members or those who engaged in ongoing relationships with one another
Predatory: wherein violence is perpetrated in as part of criminal activity or to gain something from someone else. According to the paper, "It seems to be predictable, develops slowly over time with onset in early adolescence..."
Psychopathological: wherein the violence is not due to criminal involvement or environment. As noted, "The violence tends to be more repetitive and extreme than other types... Research suggests that such behavior is related to
neural system and severe psychological trauma"
These statements are based on research and statistics, which can be found at the above links, but the first point seems to be valid under science after 60 years:
A significant number of people continue to do things that they, their families, and society in general have found detrimental (even fatal), despite their attempts to stop. Note that drug abuse and violence are only two examples of a plethora of undesired activities. I should also note that Dianetics provides explanations for why irrational behavior would happen more due to the presence of certain familiar substances in the body (drugs or otherwise), or in the presence of certain environmental factors, or in the presence of certain family members, as well as why some irrational behavior would not manifest for years (or ever) after a painful incident, but then quickly become chronic.
I'll mention 2 more controversial highlights in the next post...
Firstly, it should be noted that the author states in the last chapter, that Dianetics is not complete, and that he expects others to continue to study and improve upon his own findings. He also gives credit to dozens of authors and thousands of years of research by others, rather than claiming to be the first one to study the mind. However, he points out that some of the greatest discoveries of the past, which he used to develop Dianetics, came from people who also believed things that were found to be totally wrong. Therefore, the aim of the book is not so much on claiming to be the alpha and omega of information on the mind (as I'd previously been told). Instead the aim of the book is to determine and develop the most valuable information on the mind in regards to improving our society.
So what are some of the controversial statements found in Dianetics, and how do they stand up against modern popular science?
The main concern of the book is that individuals are not always acting in a reasonable fashion. More specifically, a part of the human mind that evolved to help us survive has outgrown it's usefulness. This part, the "reactive mind", takes over the rational part (termed the analytical mind), when it receives cues that the person's survival is being threatened. The problem is that the "reactive mind" is irrational, compelling the individual to do very strange things as a defense mechanism against whatever the perceived threat is.
The "reactive mind" grows from moments of pain and loss, which it irrationally associates with whatever was in the person's environment during those moments. As experiences differ, some people will have more of a reactive mind than others. As environments differ, some people will be compelled to have their "reactive mind" take over more than others. There is a lot more to the book, but this is my brief insight into the basic concept of Dianetics. Of course more interestingly, a method of overcoming the "reactive mind" is detailed in the book.
So how valid are the controversial claims of Dianetics? Let's take a look at a few.
1. That people sometimes do irrational things, that they did not plan to do, and that they actually regret doing, is one of the main concepts. Most notable in this concept, is the idea that some people will find themselves chronically (on an ongoing basis) behaving in a way that they really do not want to. Those people would very much like to change their behavior, but despite their desire, cannot do so.
- You may have heard people utter the expressions, "Why did I do that?", "Why do I keep doing that?", or "Sorry, I wasn't in my right mind.", but let's take a look at what modern science has to say:
The National Institute on Drug Abuse notes:
The initial decision to take drugs is mostly voluntary. However, when drug abuse takes over, a person's ability to exert self control can become seriously impaired. Brain imaging studies from drug-addicted individuals show physical changes in areas of the brain that are critical to judgment, decisionmaking, learning and memory, and behavior control.
and also notes:
As with any other disease, vulnerability to addiction differs from person to person.
the Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, in the paper "What Works in Reducing
Adolescent Violence: An Empirical Review of the Field" notes 4 patterns of adolescent violence:
Situational: wherein violence is brought about due to certain environmental conditions
Relationship: wherein violence is occurs mainly between close family members or those who engaged in ongoing relationships with one another
Predatory: wherein violence is perpetrated in as part of criminal activity or to gain something from someone else. According to the paper, "It seems to be predictable, develops slowly over time with onset in early adolescence..."
Psychopathological: wherein the violence is not due to criminal involvement or environment. As noted, "The violence tends to be more repetitive and extreme than other types... Research suggests that such behavior is related to
neural system and severe psychological trauma"
These statements are based on research and statistics, which can be found at the above links, but the first point seems to be valid under science after 60 years:
A significant number of people continue to do things that they, their families, and society in general have found detrimental (even fatal), despite their attempts to stop. Note that drug abuse and violence are only two examples of a plethora of undesired activities. I should also note that Dianetics provides explanations for why irrational behavior would happen more due to the presence of certain familiar substances in the body (drugs or otherwise), or in the presence of certain environmental factors, or in the presence of certain family members, as well as why some irrational behavior would not manifest for years (or ever) after a painful incident, but then quickly become chronic.
I'll mention 2 more controversial highlights in the next post...
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Nerd from the Hood #1
I'd like this blog series to share what I'm learning as I become a more successful MC, transitioning from a non-profit technology manager.
What I've Learned About Categories:
This is inspired by the "Intangible Wealth blog" over here. This "Nerd from the Hood" episode is a recession sensitive edition!
When things are categorized, it's easy to tell when you've done enough of one type of thing, and haven't done enough of another. For example, if you're trying to make money and you just read a book about selling albums, and a book about selling real estate, and you're getting ready to read a book about selling something else... you're not making money. Having a daily or weekly goals list (that includes categories) would let you know you've got 3 "learning" goals done, but 0 "earning" goals. Without categories, you might just think of these 3 books as 3 very different things (which they aren't LOL)!
Having a category for every little thing is a waste of time. However, not separating things into categories will eventually drain your time as well. The trick is just to use a small number of categories on your goals list. I suggest less than a dozen.
As you can see in the example above, it's important to separate Learning from Earning, Exercising, etc. In my first year of being a "full-time MC", I naively confused "Learning" time with "Earning" more times than I want to admit. What I learned to do is ask myself if talking/visiting/reading/doing [your activity here] is going to make me money Right Now. If I'm teaching a Hip-Hop Workshop, that's EARNING. If I'm performing at a school, park, library, cafe, etc., that's EARNING. But if I'm reading about how to write songs, sell albums, perform, or even if I'm negotiating a POSSIBLE gig, that's NOT EARNING... That's LEARNING.
You can name them whatever you want, as long as it's a quick way to sort your goals out and see how your spending your time. The categories I use are "EARN" "LEARN" "GROW" "EARNED" "CLEAN" "LOVE" and a few others. Briefly:
EARN: this will DEFINITELY make money (I repeat DEFINITELY! read 'is again artists!)
LEARN: reading, listening, discussing, practicing a skill
GROW: improving health by sleeping, exercising, eating, dentist checkups, etc.
CLEAN: the dishes, laundry, office, etc. makes it easier to work on other goals
LOVE: spending time with friends, family, and self (helping others with their goals, or just having fun)
EARNED: Why did I put this last? Why did I skip a space? Why am I asking questions instead of giving you a brief description of this category? LOL! Because...
I tried calling this various things, such as "Pay" "Owe" "Cash" "Money" "Buy", but none really got me as excited as "EARNED"! These activities are paying the bills, loans, filing taxes, investing, etc. It's what you do with the money you've... that's right "EARNED"! For me calling it "EARNED" connects it to my "EARN" goals, which means 2 things:
1. If it's something I really want to spend money on, it comes second to "EARNING". If I've done the EARN goals to afford it, I can buy it (it's truly EARNED). If I can't afford it, it's going to end up being a debt, which means more EARNED stuff to pay off PLUS more EARNING I have to do. Speaking of paying off debts, if the "EARNED" activity is paying a loan or credit car (something I don't want to do), it reminds me that if I "EARN" more, I would have less unwanted "EARNED" tasks, and more money to spend on wanted "EARNED" activities, products, and services.
2. You can't spell EARNED without EARN! Many artists and entrepreneurs get overwhelmed and worried with their loans, credit cards, debts, or even just their normal taxes and monthly bills. Worrying about things is unhealthy for your body, usually leads to more unwanted thoughts and activities, and most importantly in terms of this blog is a huge waste of time. You notice I don't have a category called "WORRY" right? If you start to get overwhelmed with the "EARNED" things you "have to have" or "have to pay off right now", it helps to realize that the priority is to EARN EARN EARN (and try to EARN doing something you enjoy please)!
In other words:
A. If you want to buy something you can't afford, you really don't need it as much as you need to... put in on a "wish list" and go EARN the money for it.
B. If you're about to starve to death and need a loaf of bread... there are social services available, as well as minimum wage jobs. So you have to go to an office and fill out forms to get financial assistance from the government and hang out in an office for a while, or you have to go to a supermarket (for example) fill out an application and hang out in a store for a while. Either way, you have to do something to get that bit of money, or in other words you have to EARN.
C. If you have the money for your basic needs, but choose to buy luxuries, before you pay for your rent, groceries, and loan payments, I'm going to say you're being STUPID. Most of us have done it before, but let's call it what it is... STUPID. SMART people do STUPID things like everyone else, so don't worry about if you're a STUPID person, but be honest and realize when you have done (or are being tempted to do) something STUPID!
So since you aren't stupid, we won't take up the letter "C" with that, LOL! More importantly, you may get to a point where you've resisted the urge to buy things you "WANT", but still can't afford to pay all of your bills and loans off (especially in a recession). If at this point a minimum wage job, would not put a dent in your expenses, and you're not so broke that you need social services for a while... don't give all your money to your loans. Put the money into keeping "the lights on", keeping your clothes clean, eating frugally, and keep working, and aim for a promotion at your current job, switch to a different job, or take on additional SOURCES OF INCOME. Yes, it's okay to have MULTIPLE SOURCES OF INCOME.
In a nutshell, if you can't pay your loans, don't worry about it! Just like you have to EARN before you can buy nice things that you've EARNED, you also have to EARN before you can pay off unwanted debts. So "C" is a lot like "A". Put it on the wish list, and go EARN the money for it. But please put debts on the TOP of your wish list, because...
* they grow larger every month (some daily) with interest
* delaying them can result in paying for them several times over in the long run (much more than they are literally and figuratively worth)
* if your monthly debt interest rate is higher than your monthly return from investments, YOUR INVESTMENTS ARE PUTTING YOU FURTHER IN DEBT!
* if you can't afford to pay off your debts, and you're spending money on other things, you're either using loans/cards to buy them which means you are GOING FURTHER IN TO DEBT, or you are barely paying your living expenses which means you are one paycheck away from your BASIC LIVING EXPENSES BECOMING DEBTS!
Well thanks for joining the Nerd from the Hood on this episode of going from Educational Technology Manager to Your Favorite MC! Use categories, but not more than a dozen, call them names that inspire you to get them done, and be careful that learning or discussing activities is not confused with doing them, whether it's earning money or exercising.
Final note: If I didn't use categories what would I do?
I would focus on earning. When you get better at doing something you enjoy, you get paid more per each hour you work. (If you get really good, you get paid for your books, recordings, etc. even when you're not working!). So the people you "LOVE" don't have to be burdened by hearing about how you're broke or need to borrow money all the time, the causes you "LOVE" can receive more money and time from you, you've got more time and money to "GROW" your health through sleep, exercise, and food; you've got more money and time to "LEARN" from books and teachers, and more time to "CLEAN", but of course you might just pay someone else to "CLEAN".
The point is that I've found everything I do is taken care of, the more I focus on EARNING. If you've got to much on your list, pick the thing that will EARN you the most right now, and don't worry about anything else.
NOTE: EARN doesn't mean SLAVE or BORE. If you do not enjoy your work, you're not really earning the way I'm talking about in this article. If you are doing a job that you can't get paid more for by spending less time after getting better in it, it won't EARN you money in the long term.
EARNING is giving people something so valuable that they'll work and pay you for it. Find something you enjoy giving to people and get so good at it that you are paid higher than you were when you first started, then start to coach other people to do the same. Other people will start doing the work for you, and they'll be glad to because they'll be trained and paid by an expert. You'll become so heavily in demand, that you'll have to record your experience on books, audio tapes, and videos. You'll be spending all your time with people you love, just because you want to, while your products and the people you've taught continue to pay you over and over and over and over - That's EARNing.
What I've Learned About Categories:
This is inspired by the "Intangible Wealth blog" over here. This "Nerd from the Hood" episode is a recession sensitive edition!
When things are categorized, it's easy to tell when you've done enough of one type of thing, and haven't done enough of another. For example, if you're trying to make money and you just read a book about selling albums, and a book about selling real estate, and you're getting ready to read a book about selling something else... you're not making money. Having a daily or weekly goals list (that includes categories) would let you know you've got 3 "learning" goals done, but 0 "earning" goals. Without categories, you might just think of these 3 books as 3 very different things (which they aren't LOL)!
Having a category for every little thing is a waste of time. However, not separating things into categories will eventually drain your time as well. The trick is just to use a small number of categories on your goals list. I suggest less than a dozen.
As you can see in the example above, it's important to separate Learning from Earning, Exercising, etc. In my first year of being a "full-time MC", I naively confused "Learning" time with "Earning" more times than I want to admit. What I learned to do is ask myself if talking/visiting/reading/doing [your activity here] is going to make me money Right Now. If I'm teaching a Hip-Hop Workshop, that's EARNING. If I'm performing at a school, park, library, cafe, etc., that's EARNING. But if I'm reading about how to write songs, sell albums, perform, or even if I'm negotiating a POSSIBLE gig, that's NOT EARNING... That's LEARNING.
You can name them whatever you want, as long as it's a quick way to sort your goals out and see how your spending your time. The categories I use are "EARN" "LEARN" "GROW" "EARNED" "CLEAN" "LOVE" and a few others. Briefly:
EARN: this will DEFINITELY make money (I repeat DEFINITELY! read 'is again artists!)
LEARN: reading, listening, discussing, practicing a skill
GROW: improving health by sleeping, exercising, eating, dentist checkups, etc.
CLEAN: the dishes, laundry, office, etc. makes it easier to work on other goals
LOVE: spending time with friends, family, and self (helping others with their goals, or just having fun)
EARNED: Why did I put this last? Why did I skip a space? Why am I asking questions instead of giving you a brief description of this category? LOL! Because...
I tried calling this various things, such as "Pay" "Owe" "Cash" "Money" "Buy", but none really got me as excited as "EARNED"! These activities are paying the bills, loans, filing taxes, investing, etc. It's what you do with the money you've... that's right "EARNED"! For me calling it "EARNED" connects it to my "EARN" goals, which means 2 things:
1. If it's something I really want to spend money on, it comes second to "EARNING". If I've done the EARN goals to afford it, I can buy it (it's truly EARNED). If I can't afford it, it's going to end up being a debt, which means more EARNED stuff to pay off PLUS more EARNING I have to do. Speaking of paying off debts, if the "EARNED" activity is paying a loan or credit car (something I don't want to do), it reminds me that if I "EARN" more, I would have less unwanted "EARNED" tasks, and more money to spend on wanted "EARNED" activities, products, and services.
2. You can't spell EARNED without EARN! Many artists and entrepreneurs get overwhelmed and worried with their loans, credit cards, debts, or even just their normal taxes and monthly bills. Worrying about things is unhealthy for your body, usually leads to more unwanted thoughts and activities, and most importantly in terms of this blog is a huge waste of time. You notice I don't have a category called "WORRY" right? If you start to get overwhelmed with the "EARNED" things you "have to have" or "have to pay off right now", it helps to realize that the priority is to EARN EARN EARN (and try to EARN doing something you enjoy please)!
In other words:
A. If you want to buy something you can't afford, you really don't need it as much as you need to... put in on a "wish list" and go EARN the money for it.
B. If you're about to starve to death and need a loaf of bread... there are social services available, as well as minimum wage jobs. So you have to go to an office and fill out forms to get financial assistance from the government and hang out in an office for a while, or you have to go to a supermarket (for example) fill out an application and hang out in a store for a while. Either way, you have to do something to get that bit of money, or in other words you have to EARN.
C. If you have the money for your basic needs, but choose to buy luxuries, before you pay for your rent, groceries, and loan payments, I'm going to say you're being STUPID. Most of us have done it before, but let's call it what it is... STUPID. SMART people do STUPID things like everyone else, so don't worry about if you're a STUPID person, but be honest and realize when you have done (or are being tempted to do) something STUPID!
So since you aren't stupid, we won't take up the letter "C" with that, LOL! More importantly, you may get to a point where you've resisted the urge to buy things you "WANT", but still can't afford to pay all of your bills and loans off (especially in a recession). If at this point a minimum wage job, would not put a dent in your expenses, and you're not so broke that you need social services for a while... don't give all your money to your loans. Put the money into keeping "the lights on", keeping your clothes clean, eating frugally, and keep working, and aim for a promotion at your current job, switch to a different job, or take on additional SOURCES OF INCOME. Yes, it's okay to have MULTIPLE SOURCES OF INCOME.
In a nutshell, if you can't pay your loans, don't worry about it! Just like you have to EARN before you can buy nice things that you've EARNED, you also have to EARN before you can pay off unwanted debts. So "C" is a lot like "A". Put it on the wish list, and go EARN the money for it. But please put debts on the TOP of your wish list, because...
* they grow larger every month (some daily) with interest
* delaying them can result in paying for them several times over in the long run (much more than they are literally and figuratively worth)
* if your monthly debt interest rate is higher than your monthly return from investments, YOUR INVESTMENTS ARE PUTTING YOU FURTHER IN DEBT!
* if you can't afford to pay off your debts, and you're spending money on other things, you're either using loans/cards to buy them which means you are GOING FURTHER IN TO DEBT, or you are barely paying your living expenses which means you are one paycheck away from your BASIC LIVING EXPENSES BECOMING DEBTS!
Well thanks for joining the Nerd from the Hood on this episode of going from Educational Technology Manager to Your Favorite MC! Use categories, but not more than a dozen, call them names that inspire you to get them done, and be careful that learning or discussing activities is not confused with doing them, whether it's earning money or exercising.
Final note: If I didn't use categories what would I do?
I would focus on earning. When you get better at doing something you enjoy, you get paid more per each hour you work. (If you get really good, you get paid for your books, recordings, etc. even when you're not working!). So the people you "LOVE" don't have to be burdened by hearing about how you're broke or need to borrow money all the time, the causes you "LOVE" can receive more money and time from you, you've got more time and money to "GROW" your health through sleep, exercise, and food; you've got more money and time to "LEARN" from books and teachers, and more time to "CLEAN", but of course you might just pay someone else to "CLEAN".
The point is that I've found everything I do is taken care of, the more I focus on EARNING. If you've got to much on your list, pick the thing that will EARN you the most right now, and don't worry about anything else.
NOTE: EARN doesn't mean SLAVE or BORE. If you do not enjoy your work, you're not really earning the way I'm talking about in this article. If you are doing a job that you can't get paid more for by spending less time after getting better in it, it won't EARN you money in the long term.
EARNING is giving people something so valuable that they'll work and pay you for it. Find something you enjoy giving to people and get so good at it that you are paid higher than you were when you first started, then start to coach other people to do the same. Other people will start doing the work for you, and they'll be glad to because they'll be trained and paid by an expert. You'll become so heavily in demand, that you'll have to record your experience on books, audio tapes, and videos. You'll be spending all your time with people you love, just because you want to, while your products and the people you've taught continue to pay you over and over and over and over - That's EARNing.
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Becoming a Full-Time MC
I started MCing as a young boy in the projects of the Lower East Side (Manhattan, New York City). Before long, I won a bunch of battles and talent shows, studied entrepreneurship on Wall Street, won 2nd place in a business plan competition, performed for Talib Kweli, learned small business management from Jessica Care Moore, promoted a series of Hip-Hop events, and got a computer science degree from Trinity College.
Thirsty for more life experience, I turned down a major record deal and did various jobs mostly involving teaching, technology, and Hip-Hop, which led to me working at a non-profit for 3 years (as an educational technology manager). Though I didn't put much of a dent in my college loan debt, I did something good for the community, and learned a lot about management.
After 3 years of managing by day and MCing by night, I had enough local media exposure and gig offers to make it difficult to keep doing both. It became obvious that my Hip-Hop related projects were taking my time and attention away from the technology job. When you perform in 3 cities in one day and go to work a few hours later... your body's need for sleep will force you to shift priorities! Ironically, my non-profit was running out of funding just as I was preparing to move on, so we parted on good terms.
My best skill just happens to be what I'm fanatically passionate about - inspiring large groups of people through writing, performing, collaborating, promoting, teaching, and other Hip-Hop related projects. I've decided to do what I love for a living. I've become a full-time MC!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)